The 3D semantic instance prediction task involves detecting and segmenting the object in an 3D scan mesh.

Evaluation and metrics

Our evaluation ranks all methods according to the average precision for each class. We report the mean average precision AP at overlap 0.25 (AP 25%), overlap 0.5 (AP 50%), and over overlaps in the range [0.5:0.95:0.05] (AP). Note that multiple predictions of the same ground truth instance are penalized as false positives.



This table lists the benchmark results for the 3D semantic instance with limited annotations scenario.




Method Infoavg apbathtubbedbookshelfcabinetchaircountercurtaindeskdoorotherfurniturepicturerefrigeratorshower curtainsinksofatabletoiletwindow
sorted bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort by
WS3D_LA_Inspermissive0.341 10.593 20.420 10.364 20.175 10.578 10.004 30.456 10.092 10.194 10.267 20.164 10.330 10.390 20.186 10.523 10.315 10.858 10.221 1
Kangcheng Liu: WS3D: Weakly Supervised 3D Scene Segmentation with Region-Level Boundary Awareness and Instance Discrimination. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022
Box2Mask_LA0.289 20.741 10.274 40.418 10.093 50.427 20.015 20.290 30.046 20.116 30.272 10.158 20.273 20.613 10.066 50.364 30.136 50.707 30.192 2
Julian Chibane, Francis Engelmann, Tuan Anh Tran, Gerard Pons-Moll: Box2Mask: Weakly Supervised 3D Semantic Instance Segmentation Using Bounding Boxes. ECCV 2022
CSC_LA_INS0.229 30.556 40.300 30.240 30.133 20.347 30.026 10.286 40.003 40.071 40.132 40.012 40.122 40.305 30.181 20.301 40.194 20.826 20.087 3
PointContrast_LA_INS0.216 40.593 20.259 50.110 50.129 30.338 40.003 50.347 20.008 30.120 20.149 30.014 30.227 30.118 50.175 30.372 20.149 40.691 40.086 4
Scratch_LA_INS0.147 50.111 50.309 20.119 40.093 40.315 50.003 40.175 50.001 50.044 50.069 50.000 50.019 50.187 40.094 40.286 50.162 30.624 50.038 5