The 3D semantic instance prediction task involves detecting and segmenting the object in an 3D scan mesh.

Evaluation and metrics

Our evaluation ranks all methods according to the average precision for each class. We report the mean average precision AP at overlap 0.25 (AP 25%), overlap 0.5 (AP 50%), and over overlaps in the range [0.5:0.95:0.05] (AP). Note that multiple predictions of the same ground truth instance are penalized as false positives.



This table lists the benchmark results for the 3D semantic instance with limited reconstructions scenario.




Method Infoavg ap 25%bathtubbedbookshelfcabinetchaircountercurtaindeskdoorotherfurniturepicturerefrigeratorshower curtainsinksofatabletoiletwindow
sorted bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort by
WS3D_LR_Ins0.781 11.000 10.917 10.798 50.766 20.838 60.489 10.751 10.737 30.645 20.672 10.631 20.600 11.000 10.880 10.883 60.761 10.997 40.695 1
Kangcheng Liu: WS3D: Weakly Supervised 3D Scene Segmentation with Region-Level Boundary Awareness and Instance Discrimination. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022
InstTeacher3D0.735 21.000 10.805 30.791 60.777 10.893 10.319 50.694 20.716 40.655 10.623 20.639 10.550 20.714 30.794 40.910 20.732 30.997 40.620 2
TWIST+CSC0.693 31.000 10.791 40.857 20.637 50.873 20.394 20.506 50.826 10.633 30.587 30.292 30.550 20.714 30.802 30.891 50.672 61.000 10.451 5
Ruihang Chu: TWIST: Two-Way Inter-label Self-Training for Semi-supervised 3D Instance Segmentation. CVPR 2022
CSC_LR_INS0.683 41.000 10.818 20.831 40.680 30.856 50.350 30.471 60.803 20.547 50.564 40.277 40.542 50.714 30.824 20.909 30.746 20.944 60.417 6
PointContrast_LR_INS0.676 50.903 60.773 50.867 10.590 60.863 40.350 30.686 30.630 60.539 60.541 60.184 60.495 60.857 20.790 50.928 10.694 51.000 10.475 3
Scratch_LR_INS0.673 61.000 10.773 50.852 30.653 40.865 30.300 60.597 40.655 50.586 40.550 50.215 50.546 40.714 30.734 60.891 40.710 41.000 10.468 4