The 3D semantic instance prediction task involves detecting and segmenting the object in an 3D scan mesh.

Evaluation and metrics

Our evaluation ranks all methods according to the average precision for each class. We report the mean average precision AP at overlap 0.25 (AP 25%), overlap 0.5 (AP 50%), and over overlaps in the range [0.5:0.95:0.05] (AP). Note that multiple predictions of the same ground truth instance are penalized as false positives.



This table lists the benchmark results for the 3D semantic instance with limited annotations scenario.




Method Infoavg apbathtubbedbookshelfcabinetchaircountercurtaindeskdoorotherfurniturepicturerefrigeratorshower curtainsinksofatabletoiletwindow
sorted bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort by
WS3D_LA_Inspermissive0.364 10.556 20.444 10.328 20.222 10.598 10.005 40.544 10.065 10.185 10.274 20.177 20.452 10.654 10.171 30.455 20.333 10.892 10.193 1
Kangcheng Liu: WS3D: Weakly Supervised 3D Scene Segmentation with Region-Level Boundary Awareness and Instance Discrimination. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022
Box2Mask_LA0.327 20.852 10.336 50.381 10.162 20.508 20.052 10.205 50.061 20.154 20.313 10.208 10.299 30.530 30.165 40.492 10.213 30.784 20.162 2
Julian Chibane, Francis Engelmann, Tuan Anh Tran, Gerard Pons-Moll: Box2Mask: Weakly Supervised 3D Semantic Instance Segmentation Using Bounding Boxes. ECCV 2022
CSC_LA_INS0.258 30.485 40.356 40.298 30.114 40.364 30.044 20.223 40.022 30.136 30.217 30.036 30.214 40.507 40.191 20.363 40.221 20.776 30.079 4
PointContrast_LA_INS0.256 40.519 30.376 30.216 50.099 50.347 40.026 30.443 20.017 40.113 50.142 40.008 50.137 50.586 20.219 10.362 50.149 50.775 40.078 5
Scratch_LA_INS0.241 50.463 50.402 20.220 40.131 30.306 50.005 40.307 30.006 50.131 40.131 50.034 40.301 20.376 50.114 50.427 30.186 40.723 50.083 3