The 3D semantic instance prediction task involves detecting and segmenting the object in an 3D scan mesh.

Evaluation and metrics

Our evaluation ranks all methods according to the average precision for each class. We report the mean average precision AP at overlap 0.25 (AP 25%), overlap 0.5 (AP 50%), and over overlaps in the range [0.5:0.95:0.05] (AP). Note that multiple predictions of the same ground truth instance are penalized as false positives.



This table lists the benchmark results for the 3D semantic instance with limited annotations scenario.




Method Infoavg apbathtubbedbookshelfcabinetchaircountercurtaindeskdoorotherfurniturepicturerefrigeratorshower curtainsinksofatabletoiletwindow
sorted bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort bysort by
WS3D_LA_Inspermissive0.442 10.787 10.554 10.488 10.363 10.651 10.035 10.440 10.202 10.307 10.417 10.253 20.329 30.617 10.243 10.594 10.467 10.867 10.348 1
Kangcheng Liu: WS3D: Weakly Supervised 3D Scene Segmentation with Region-Level Boundary Awareness and Instance Discrimination. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2022
Box2Mask_LA0.341 20.667 20.265 50.385 20.200 20.536 20.026 20.314 30.074 20.159 40.402 20.281 10.335 20.450 50.170 30.570 20.241 50.836 30.221 2
Julian Chibane, Francis Engelmann, Tuan Anh Tran, Gerard Pons-Moll: Box2Mask: Weakly Supervised 3D Semantic Instance Segmentation Using Bounding Boxes. ECCV 2022
CSC_LA_INS0.293 30.485 30.397 30.333 30.168 30.415 30.010 30.337 20.018 40.168 30.263 30.057 30.193 50.495 30.141 40.525 40.318 20.837 20.120 5
PointContrast_LA_INS0.278 40.472 40.427 20.229 50.121 50.327 40.009 40.257 40.021 30.180 20.176 50.019 50.350 10.460 40.098 50.563 30.292 30.834 40.163 3
Scratch_LA_INS0.248 50.122 50.376 40.319 40.158 40.319 50.006 50.239 50.013 50.138 50.206 40.029 40.299 40.506 20.183 20.441 50.259 40.738 50.121 4